Peer-review

Dear all,

It is time to complete the peer review for the group work (harvard cases + Vaatepuu). As said, this will be dealt with anonymously, meaning that we will not disclose the actual grades to anybody from your team. Remember that you will be only grading others, not yourself. We will be adjusting grades if multiple people from the same group call out the same group member with a bad grade. Please send your peer evaluation by 1.3.2020 by answering to this assignment.

 

Please fill in the following chart according to these instructions and submit it as a text to this "assignment" :

 

1.  INSERT YOUR NAME DO NOT PUT A GRADE FOR YOURSELF

 

2.  TEAM MEMBER NAME GRADE (0-100)

3.  TEAM MEMBER NAME GRADE (0-100)

4.  TEAM MEMBER NAME GRADE (0-100)

5.  TEAM MEMBER NAME GRADE (0-100)

 

Grading:

91-100: Great work, did everything that was agreed and was helpful to others. Was active in communication and team leadership. 

76-90: Overall good work, but there were some issues with the work, proactiveness, and communication. 

61-75: Several issues with group work participation. Did not communicate, volunteer for tasks, was tardy, and did not proactively help others. 

<60: Barely contributed or even hindered the group work. Was not a reliable group member, and was generally unhelpful.