Hello, I have one question. Do I find a Finnish language adequate terminology somewhere. I teach a lot bachelors.

	Kaj (and other Finnish-speaking): Here are two sources for gathering Finnish terminology relating to sustainability education and the SDGs: https://finto.fi/keko/fi/index/I; https://www.ykliitto.fi/. What specific terminology did you mean - competencies, general about sustainability, SDGs ...?

	All of the SDGs are essential, I don’t think there is a universal hierarchy of SDGs but a relational one. Depending on the actor / business there are obvious SDGs (those we can directly impact through our work) and less obvious ones (those that might impact us but that we feel are not directly linked), or rather: immediate and less immediate ones.

Most important SDG:
13:19:33 From  Jaan Praks  to  Everyone:
	SDG15.: Life on land. If we cannot achieve this, everything is lost.
13:19:45 From  Matti Kuittinen  to  Everyone:
	I choose 17, because it is an institutional approach through which many of the other SDGs could be addressed.
13:19:55 From  Jaan Praks  to  Everyone:
	I stress. Everything, including live in ocean.
13:19:55 From  Roope Husgafvel  to  Everyone:
	SDG 15/Life on land: protect and sustain all life
13:20:54 From  Kaj Jakobsson  to  Everyone:
	SDG7 it is the basis for human activities as we know it
13:20:58 From  Paulo Pinho  to  Everyone:
	SDG 12: Because consumption and production are in my opinion the key reasons for the sustainability issues we are currently facing.
13:21:52 From  Camilla Vornanen  to  Everyone:
	11: The unsustainable actions and problems born in cities and human communities. Without our communities, we don't have crisis. Therefore, this might cover the rest.
13:21:53 From  Julia Lohmann  to  Everyone:
	I take 14. Ocean Acidification is harming life under water, but if the ocean cannot sustain life we are losing its ‘eco-system services’ that make our lives possible. So to attain SDG 14 we need to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere but the ocean can also help us do it. - But really, all goals are linked in a big knot what we are discussing here on which string to pull first.
13:22:09 From  Tuulia Puustinen  to  Everyone:
	SDG1: this is a starting point to every aspect of equality and for the capacity for to make sustainable changes for the world
13:22:15 From  Reetta Karinen  to  Everyone:
	13: climate change. without that solving many other SDG's will become more difficult
13:22:23 From  Jaan Praks  to  Everyone:
	If we cannot have life on land over longer period, higher evolution level life is disappeared for millions of years. There might survive something in the ocean. In this sense ocean life is even more fundamental.
13:23:04 From  Simo Lahdenne  to  Everyone:
	SDG 16: Getting education for all will ensure that the local issues can be focused an solve the others as we increase the pool of people that understand and can solve these and future problems
13:23:21 From  Claudio Roncoli  to  Everyone:
	SDG 13. Without adapting to climate change, any other objectives may be lost sooner or later
13:23:28 From  Simo Lahdenne  to  Everyone:
	*SDG4 not 16 :D

13:25:40 From  Julia Lohmann  to  Everyone:
	For us educators this is also really interesting: The “inner development goals” that help us understand which mindsets can help us advance the SDG goals: https://www.innerdevelopmentgoals.org/
13:25:58 From  Julia Lohmann  to  Everyone:
	…and how we can support building these mindsets
13:27:21 From  Jaan Praks  to  Everyone:
	I do not agree that there is no hierarchy. Many SDG in the case of failure can exclude others. Failure in gender equality will make high quality education impossible.
13:28:40 From  Matti Kuittinen  to  Everyone:
	This week´s IPCC report is among the few one´s that dare to address the importance of sufficiency. So far, growth and consumption have been taken as a starting point, and this applies also to IPCC´s emission scenarios. However, degrowth should also be modelled. 
13:29:03 From  Julia Lohmann  to  Everyone:
	Really important point Matti!
13:37:00 From  Jaan Praks  to  Everyone:
	I challenge the "complexity" as an excuse. If your house is in fire, you do not make a committee to discuss complexity of the problem. You put the fire off. We know what is the problem. We even know how to solve the most acute problem. We know that high level policy actions is the only way to affect our course.
13:40:50 From  Roope Husgafvel  to  Everyone:
	Jaan, yes many agree that leadership (e.g political) and strong normative guidance (laws) are needed. Especially if and when voluntary approaches and/or market measures have failed.
13:49:08 From  Matti Kuittinen  to  Everyone:
	When we think of SDGs, we should consider who is "we"? Do the rich educated westerners have a right to say to an undernourished representative of a 3rd world country which SDGs should be prioritised? On which basis? Should we support subjective democracy or scientific oligarchy?

14:53:50 From  Tuulia Puustinen  to  Everyone:
	I teach a lot about residential densification: it is all about tradeoffs in terms of sustainability. But I think that delivering this knowledge to students has positive impact…