Review Form
The form itself is shown below.
Overall evaluation.
* Please provide a detailed review, including a justification for your scores. Both the score and the review text are required.
Reviewer's confidence.
* as assessed by the reviewer themselves
Confidential remarks for the program committee. If you wish to add any remarks intended only for PC members please write them below. These remarks will only be seen by the PC members having access to reviews for this submission. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is optional.
|
Rubric
Missing content. If the paper appears incomplete, then mark that here, indicate in the overall evaluation what you considered incomplete, and use the text boxes to clarify your responses to the questions below as needed.
Language. Assess the usage of English language in the paper
Content. Does the structure of the paper clearly convey a message (regardless of whether the message seems scientifically correct)? If not, explain how it could be improved.
Illustrations. Do figures, tables and equations clearly present information supporting the message?
Captions. Do figures and tables work well with the text?
Formatting. Does the formatting of the paper comply with the instructions in the template?
Scientific quality. Does the evidence presented in the paper support the conclusions of the paper?
References. Are the references suitable?
Bibliography. Is the bibliography properly presented?
DOI. document object identifier
|