JOIN.bsc - Bachelor's Thesis and Seminar (summer course), 07.06.2021-31.08.2021

Topic outline

• PHASE 1: Getting Started (07.06 - 14.06)
  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  • Select activity 07.06.2021 Session 1

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    07.06.2021 Session 1
    

    
    

  • Select activity Text and media area

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    
    
  • Select activity PPT Slides for 07.06.2021

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    PPT Slides for 07.06.2021 Folder
  • Select activity Activity 1a: Toulmin-Zappen model practice (Jurass...

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    Activity 1a: Toulmin-Zappen model practice (Jurassic Park)
    

    Practice the Toulmin-Zappen model with a partner. Watch the Jurassic Park clip below and work out the rhetorical pattern of the arguments. Post your ideas in the Padlet.
    

    
    

    

  • Select activity Activity 1b: Toulmin-Zappen Model (for YOUR THESIS...

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    Activity 1b: Toulmin-Zappen Model (for YOUR THESIS TOPIC)
    

    
    

    
  • Select activity Activity 2: Purpose Statement Generator

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Activity 2: Purpose Statement Generator Page

    1. After you have completed the Toulmin-Zappen model, try the Purpose Statement Generator and post your result in the forum.
    

    2. Reflect on the output. How close is this to how you saw the purpose?

    3. Comment on at least one other Purpose Statement.
    

    
    

  • Select activity Activity 3: Purpose Statements

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Activity 3: Purpose Statements Forum

    After you try the Purpose Statement generator, post your Purpose Statement here.
    

  • Select activity 10.06.2021 Session 2

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    10.06.2021 Session 2
    

  • Select activity Text and media area

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  • Select activity Text and media area

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  • Select activity Bachelor’s seminar information retrieval 2021

    

    Bachelor’s seminar information retrieval 2021 File PDF
  • Select activity Bachelors seminar referencing 2021

    

    Bachelors seminar referencing 2021 File PDF
  • Select activity Climate change

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Climate change File PDF
  • Select activity Avoiding Plagiarism Questions 2020 handout

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Avoiding Plagiarism Questions 2020 handout File PDF
  • Select activity Plagiarism 2021

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Plagiarism 2021 File PDF
  • Select activity Literature as evidence 2021

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Literature as evidence 2021 File PDF
  • Select activity Systematic Lit Review template

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Systematic Lit Review template File DOCX
  • Select activity Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. (2007) Guidelines ...

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. (2007) Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Evidence-Based Software Engineering Technical Report, EBSE-2007-01. Keele and Durham, UK: Keele University and University of Durham.
    

  • Select activity Further Discussion & Criticism of Systematic Liter...

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    Further Discussion & Criticism of Systematic Literature Reviews

    
    

    Biolchini, J., Mian, P., Natali, A. & Travassos, G. (2005) Systematic Review in Software Engineering. Technical Report ES 679/05. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: COPPE / UFRJ, Systems Engineering and Computer Science Department.
    

    
    

    Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 331(7524), 1064–1065. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68

    
    

    Kitchenham, B. & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 55 (12), 2049-2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010.
    

    
    

    Wohlin, C. (2014) Guidelines for Snowballing in Systematic Literature Studies and a Replication in Software Engineering. Proceedings of EASE '14, the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). http://www.wohlin.eu/ease14.pdf
    
  • Select activity 14.06.2021 Session 3

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    14.06.2021 Session 3
    

    
    

  • Select activity Text and media area

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  • Select activity Text and media area

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  • Select activity Click here to go to the Key Writing Assignments-->Draft Research Plan to give feedback to a partner.

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Click here to go to the Key Writing Assignments-->Draft Research Plan to give feedback to a partner. URL

    You should have posted your Draft Research Plan by 23:59 on 11.06.2021. Click on the link to give feedback to a partner.

    In Session 3, choose another student's entry and give feedback. Start by first replying to their entry with your name so others will know it is taken. (Make sure everyone gets feedback.)

      
    

        Copy and paste the following questions into your reply for your partner:

    • Does the table of contents include each section of the thesis? Would you add or change anything?
    • How clear was the introduction? Would you add or change anything?
    • Does the introduction follow the Toulmin-Zappen model?
    • Check the sources. Which style guide is being used? Is it consistent?
    • How realistic is the timeline based on the scope of the research?

    
    

  • Select activity How to limit the scope of your thesis

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    How to limit the scope of your thesis File PDF
  • Select activity Adapted CRAAP Test worksheet

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Adapted CRAAP Test worksheet File PDF
  • Select activity "Journal Article" by NVidia (in Cornell University ArXiv)

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    "Journal Article" by NVidia (in Cornell University ArXiv) File PDF

    This is the example I showed in class when I mentioned about critically assessing your sources. Please see the attached CRAAP model for more considerations of how to critically assess a source.
    

  • Select activity Surveys and Interviews (Optional viewing)You only ...

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    Surveys and Interviews (Optional viewing)
    

    You only need to watch this if you are planning to use questionnaires or interviews in your research.

    
    
  • Select activity Sample questionnaire

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    Sample questionnaire File PDF
  • Select activity Research ethics and Finnish national guidelines Re...

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    Research ethics and Finnish national guidelines

    Responsible conduct of research (CC BY 4.0 Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity (TENK))

    
    

    Ethical review in the human sciences (CC BY 4.0 Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity (TENK))

    *Worth watching if you will be conducting research on people -- e.g., interviews or surveys.
    

    Guidelines for Ethical Research
    

    Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. [Guidelines] Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. https://tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf
    

  • Select activity Further information on credible sourcesPredatory j...

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    Further information on credible sources
    

    Predatory journals
    

    Beall's List of Potential Predatory Journals and Publishers:  https://beallslist.net/

    Thought Leadership Marketing

    Barry, J. and Gironda J. (2019). Operationalizing thought leadership for online B2B marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 81, 138-159. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Barry5/publication/322011357_Operationalizing_thought_leadership_for_online_B2B_marketing/links/5ec5a33a458515626cbbe38e/Operationalizing-thought-leadership-for-online-B2B-marketing.pdf
    

    
    

    Magno, F. and Cassia, F. (2019). Establishing thought leadership through social media in B2B settings: effects on customer relationship performance", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2018-0410

    Company white papers

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_paper

    Issues with Open Access

    Open access in Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access
    

    ArXiv:  Merali, Z. (2016). ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process. Nature, News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19267
    

  • Select activity LaTeX tutorial (Links)

    Not available unless: You are a(n) Student

    

    LaTeX tutorial (Links) Page