Practice the Toulmin-Zappen model with a partner. Watch the Jurassic Park clip below and work out the rhetorical pattern of the arguments. Post your ideas in the Padlet.
1. After you have completed the Toulmin-Zappen model, try the Purpose Statement Generator and post your result in the forum.
2. Reflect on the output. How close is this to how you saw the purpose?
3. Comment on at least one other Purpose Statement.
After you try the Purpose Statement generator, post your Purpose Statement here.
Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. (2007) Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Evidence-Based Software Engineering Technical Report, EBSE-2007-01. Keele and Durham, UK: Keele University and University of Durham.
You should have posted your Draft Research Plan by 23:59 on 11.06.2021. Click on the link to give feedback to a partner.
This is the example I showed in class when I mentioned about critically assessing your sources. Please see the attached CRAAP model for more considerations of how to critically assess a source.
Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. [Guidelines] Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. https://tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf
Beall's List of Potential Predatory Journals and Publishers: https://beallslist.net/
Magno, F. and Cassia, F. (2019). Establishing thought leadership through social media in B2B settings: effects on customer relationship performance", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2018-0410
ArXiv: Merali, Z. (2016). ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process. Nature, News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19267