Course: JOIN.bsc - Bachelor's Thesis and Seminar (summer course), 07.06.2021-31.08.2021, Topic: PHASE 1: Getting Started (07.06

PHASE 1: Getting Started (07.06 - 14.06)

PHASE 1: Getting Started (07.06 - 14.06)
PHASE 1: Getting Started (07.06 - 14.06)
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  07.06.2021 Session 1
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  PPT Slides for 07.06.2021 Folder
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Activity 1a: Toulmin-Zappen model practice (Jurassic Park)
  
  Practice the Toulmin-Zappen model with a partner. Watch the Jurassic Park clip below and work out the rhetorical pattern of the arguments. Post your ideas in the Padlet.
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  
  Activity 1b: Toulmin-Zappen Model (for YOUR THESIS TOPIC)
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Activity 2: Purpose Statement Generator Page
  1. After you have completed the Toulmin-Zappen model, try the Purpose Statement Generator and post your result in the forum.
  2. Reflect on the output. How close is this to how you saw the purpose?
  3. Comment on at least one other Purpose Statement.
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Activity 3: Purpose Statements Forum
  After you try the Purpose Statement generator, post your Purpose Statement here.
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  10.06.2021 Session 2
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
- Bachelor’s seminar information retrieval 2021 File PDF document
- Bachelors seminar referencing 2021 File PDF document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Climate change File
  PDF document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Avoiding Plagiarism Questions 2020 handout File
  PDF document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Plagiarism 2021 File
  PDF document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Literature as evidence 2021 File
  PDF document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Systematic Lit Review template File
  Word 2007 document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. (2007) Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Evidence-Based Software Engineering Technical Report, EBSE-2007-01. Keele and Durham, UK: Keele University and University of Durham.
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Further Discussion & Criticism of Systematic Literature Reviews
  
  Biolchini, J., Mian, P., Natali, A. & Travassos, G. (2005) Systematic Review in Software Engineering. Technical Report ES 679/05. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: COPPE / UFRJ, Systems Engineering and Computer Science Department.
  
  Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 331(7524), 1064–1065. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
  
  Kitchenham, B. & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 55 (12), 2049-2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010.
  
  Wohlin, C. (2014) Guidelines for Snowballing in Systematic Literature Studies and a Replication in Software Engineering. Proceedings of EASE '14, the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). http://www.wohlin.eu/ease14.pdf
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  14.06.2021 Session 3
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Click here to go to the Key Writing Assignments-->Draft Research Plan to give feedback to a partner. URL
  You should have posted your Draft Research Plan by 23:59 on 11.06.2021. Click on the link to give feedback to a partner.
  In Session 3, choose another student's entry and give feedback. Start by first replying to their entry with your name so others will know it is taken. (Make sure everyone gets feedback.)
  
  Copy and paste the following questions into your reply for your partner:
  Does the table of contents include each section of the thesis? Would you add or change anything?
  How clear was the introduction? Would you add or change anything?
  Does the introduction follow the Toulmin-Zappen model?
  Check the sources. Which style guide is being used? Is it consistent?
  How realistic is the timeline based on the scope of the research?
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  How to limit the scope of your thesis File
  PDF document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Adapted CRAAP Test worksheet File
  PDF document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  "Journal Article" by NVidia (in Cornell University ArXiv) File
  PDF document
  This is the example I showed in class when I mentioned about critically assessing your sources. Please see the attached CRAAP model for more considerations of how to critically assess a source.
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Surveys and Interviews (Optional viewing)
  You only need to watch this if you are planning to use questionnaires or interviews in your research.
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Sample questionnaire File
  PDF document
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Research ethics and Finnish national guidelines
  
  Responsible conduct of research (CC BY 4.0 Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity (TENK))
  
  Ethical review in the human sciences (CC BY 4.0 Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity (TENK))
  
  *Worth watching if you will be conducting research on people -- e.g., interviews or surveys.
  
  Guidelines for Ethical Research
  Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. [Guidelines] Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. https://tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  Further information on credible sources
  Predatory journals
  Beall's List of Potential Predatory Journals and Publishers: https://beallslist.net/
  Thought Leadership Marketing
  Barry, J. and Gironda J. (2019). Operationalizing thought leadership for online B2B marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 81, 138-159. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Barry5/publication/322011357_Operationalizing_thought_leadership_for_online_B2B_marketing/links/5ec5a33a458515626cbbe38e/Operationalizing-thought-leadership-for-online-B2B-marketing.pdf
  
  Magno, F. and Cassia, F. (2019). Establishing thought leadership through social media in B2B settings: effects on customer relationship performance", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2018-0410
  Company white papers
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_paper
  Issues with Open Access
  Open access in Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access
  ArXiv: Merali, Z. (2016). ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process. Nature, News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19267
- Restricted Not available unless: You are a(n) Student
  LaTeX tutorial (Links) Page