Topic outline

  • Session 11: practice elevator pitches (April 3)

    During this session the following will pitch. The others will be in the audience and will give feedback.

    1.      Wang Rosanna

    2.      Tarkiainen Yasmine Isabella

    3.      Hallam Joseph Jari

    4.      Luoma Unna Wilhelmiina

    5.      Fiorella de Freitas Vitória

    6.      Rozmarynowska Hanna Magdalena

    7.      Lehtisalo Markus Aukusti

    8.      Korchagina Polina

    9.      Henna Kyrö

    10.  Charlot-Wauquier Karen

    11.  Sevit Marek

    12.  Laurencier Alexandre Pierre Michel

    13.  Alka Zofia

    14.  Guerrero Pattugalan Ignacio José

    15.  Rochelle Toscano

    16.  Anna Ledovska


    • Forum icon
      Feedback on elevator pitches Forum

      Give brief feedback on the elevator pitch:

      Peer feedback

      Comment briefly on:

      The introduction: did it contain an effective attention grabber? Was credibility established? What could be improved.

      Delivery: were pathos, logos, and ethos used? Was there sufficient variety in the intonation and stress of the speaker? Was the volume appropriate? Was good body language used? What could be improved

      Content: Was the main message clear? Were transitions used between points? What could be improved.

      Conclusion: Was there a clear conclusion with a take-home message? Did it return to the attention grabber at the beginning? Was the conclusion signaled using signposting language? What could be improved

        


    • Homework:

      Revise your report according to my feedback (once you get it) and submit to turnitin by 19 April. Work on your video presentation. Fine tune your elevator pitch according to the feedback.

      Give feedback on the course.

    • Assignment icon
      Give your feedback on the course Assignment
◄ Previous section
Session 10: practice elevator pitches (March 31)
Next section ►
Session 12: Final Elevator pitches (April 19)