Please note! Course description is confirmed for two academic years, which means that in general, e.g. Learning outcomes, assessment methods and key content stays unchanged. However, via course syllabus, it is possible to specify or change the course execution in each realization of the course, such as how the contact sessions are organized, assessment methods weighted or materials used.

LEARNING OUTCOMES

The thesis preparation seminar provides a setting for research that involves analysis, interpretation and critical thinking. The objective is to help students situate, define, and refine the parameters of a thesis project to be executed in a subsequent semester.

Credits: 5

Schedule: 11.09.2020 - 11.12.2020

Teacher in charge (valid 01.08.2020-31.07.2022): Hossam Hewidy, Tommy Lindgren, Tommy Lindgren

Teacher in charge (applies in this implementation): Hossam Hewidy, Tommy Lindgren, Tommy Lindgren

Contact information for the course (valid 14.08.2020-21.12.2112):

Tommy Lindgren and Hossam Hewidy

Tommy Lindgren
Lecturer / Urban Design
tommy.lindgren@aalto.fi

Hossam Hewidy
Lecturer / Urban and Regional Planning
hossam.hewidy@aalto.fi


CEFR level (applies in this implementation):

Language of instruction and studies (valid 01.08.2020-31.07.2022):

Teaching language: English

Languages of study attainment: English

CONTENT, ASSESSMENT AND WORKLOAD

Content
  • Valid 01.08.2020-31.07.2022:

    The majority of work is to be conducted independently, assisted by weekly classes that include lectures, student presentation/class discussion of assigned readings and individual tutorials. Lectures will address the key components of the Thesis:
    Thesis proposal, Thesis research, Project plan
    During the sessions discussions are held in groups, divided according to Thesis topic descriptions (design/research/etc.) - the groups will be at the core of the course, giving the students a forum where to sound out their ideas and learn from each other (sources, approaches, references, problem solving,...) - the teachers will act as facilitators of the discussion, dividing discussion time evenly, and if needed, guiding the discussion towards the main goals of each days discussion topic.

Assessment Methods and Criteria
  • Applies in this implementation:

    Evaluation for the course is pass/fail.
    The final portfolio to be
    produced on the course is the outcome that is evaluated and the
    evaluation is based on how the different parts of the portfolio fulfill
    their descriptions (each part is its own 'assignment').

Workload
  • Valid 01.08.2020-31.07.2022:

    Participating in seminar (lectures) 36h (36+36)

    Preparing written reports and plans (5500 words, approx. 10 pages) 54h

  • Applies in this implementation:

    Lecture participation and discussion = 55h
    Reading = 25h
    Writing total = 44h
    124h / 27,5h/credits = 4,5 credits ~ 5credits

DETAILS

Study Material
  • Valid 01.08.2020-31.07.2022:

    Material provided in the lectures and literature:

    Booth et al.: The Craft of Research, 2nd ed., the University of Chicago Press 1995
    Flick: An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 4th ed., SAGE 2009
    Gerber and Kurath: Handbook of Methods for Architecture and Urban Design, Triest Verlag, 2018
    Groat and Wang: Architectural research Methods, John Wiley & Sons 2012
    Till, Jeremy: Architectural Research: Three Myths and One Model, 2008