Assessment for and of Learning 2019 Autumn

Materials

• Materials
  

  Materials

  For the third contact day, you can select 1 paper from the following list:

  
  

  Feedback

  Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559

   

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Rubrics

  
  

  Andrade and  Du. 2007. Student responses to criteria referenced self-assessment

  Miihkinen* and Virtanen. 2017. Development and Application of Assessment Standards to Advanced Written Assignments

  *Aalto

  Panadero &  Romero 2014 To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of selfassessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy

  
  

  Peer-assessment

  
  

  Davey & Palmer 2012. Student Peer Assessment: A research study in a level III core course of the bachelor chemical engineering program

  Yucel et al. 2014. The road to self-assessment: exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a  scientific report

   

  Self-assessment

  
  

  Cukusic et al 2014. Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions

  Häsä et al. 2019 Evaluating students' self-assessment in large classes. In Print.

  
  

  Panadero, Brown, Strijbos. 2015. The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions

  
  

  
  

  Continuous assessment

  Tuunila & Pulkkinen 2014 Effect of continuous assessment on learning outcomes on two chemical engineering courses: case study

  
  

  
  

  Validity and reliability

  Crisp 2017

  
  

  Student Evaluation in Design Studio Courses, Aalto

  - Thomas Laine. Thesis.
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  

  NOT so in focus in this course but in first day slides

  Conceptions of assessment
  

  - Halinen, K. Ruohoniemi, M., Katajavuori, N. & Virtanen, V. 2012.  Life science teachers’ discourse on assessment: a valuable insight into the variable conceptions of assessment in higher education Journal of Biological Education pp. 1-7;
  

  - Postareff, L., Virtanen, V.,  Katajavuori, N. &, Lindblom-Ylänne, S. 2012 Academics’ conceptions of the purpose assessment and their assessment practices. Studies in Educational Evaluation 38, 3–4, 84–92. 

  
  

  
  

   

  
  

  
  

   

  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  • Rubrics Folder
  • Andrade&Du2007 File PDF-dokument
  • Crisp 2017 File PDF-dokument
  • Cucusic et al 2015 File PDF-dokument
  • Davey & Palmer 2012 File PDF-dokument
  • Häsä et al 2019 File PDF-dokument
  • Miihkinen&Virtanen2017 File PDF-dokument
  • PanaderoBrownStrijbos2015 File PDF-dokument
  • Panadero & Romero 2013 File PDF-dokument
  • Tuunila&Pulkkinen2014 File PDF-dokument
  • Yucel & al. 2014 File PDF-dokument
  • Laine, T. 2018. Empower Student. Student evaluation in Design Studio Courses File PDF-dokument
  • Nicol 2010 File PDF-dokument