Topic outline

  • Article Reviews

    Please note that each review is a two-page report. This means that if the reading package for a given lecture has more than one article, the page limit for the report is still two pages. Alternatively put, it is two pages/report, not two pages/article.

    Accepted file types:

    • Reviews 1 and 2: .pdf;
    • Reviews 3 to 7: .pdf (policy change to enable PDF annotation feedback).

    Grading rubric for the article reviews

    • O = no content or nonsensical content
    • 1  = The writer misunderstands or misinterprets the article(s). Nevertheless, the review shows that the writer at least has read the article(s).
    • 2 = The report shows superficial analyses. For instance, the writer just simply summarizes the article(s).
    • 3 = The writer has a decent basis of understanding and analysis of the concept under study
    • 4 = The writer shows superior analysis and critical thinking of the concept under study and distinguishes himself/herself from other peer reports

◄ Previous section
Reading Materials
Next section ►
MIT Beer Game Simulation