Assessment Criteria

The course grade is derived from a blend of collective project tasks and personal inputs.

Group tasks involve a collaborative project, which is shared in the format of a weekly assignment as well as discussed during Friday mentoring sessions.

  • 1 (passable) = The project results and/or procedure display serious flaws with substandard execution and minimal effort. 
  • 2 (satisfactory) = The project results and/or procedure reveal shortcomings, indicating that crucial aspects of the learning objectives have not been thoroughly comprehended or acknowledged. 
  • 3 (good) = The project outcomes and methods meet the anticipated quality standards and are documented clearly. However, the project lacks insights or originality. 
  • 4 (very good) = Besides meeting the grade 3 criteria, the project showcases certain aspects that have been exceptionally executed or conceptualised. 
  • 5 (excellent) = On top of satisfying the grade 4 criteria, the project includes elements that are innovative, unique, and creative, and have been carried out with superior quality.

General remarks

Personal contributions can either elevate, lower, or leave the group project grade unchanged. The final grade is influenced by the following factors:

  • the total amount as well as the quality of insight of the individual learning reflections
  • Participation in classes and tutoring sessions 
  • Active and constructive contribution to group work 
  • In both lectures and tutoring sessions, a minimum of 80% attendance is mandatory from the start to the end of the educational session.
  • In case of unavoidable absence from an educational session, it's necessary to inform in advance.
Grading weights

Completion of all individual & group assignments and exercises. The final grade will be awarded on a Team Basis. - Team Presentation: 40%. - Team Report: 60% (and factoring in the quantity of the other assignments)

Senast redigerad: lördag, 9 september 2023, 13:25