MUO-E0105 - Research and Inspire, Lecture, 25.10.2022-29.11.2022
This course space end date is set to 29.11.2022 Search Courses: MUO-E0105
Step 3: PROOF (30p/30%)
Completion requirements
Weak (0-9)= Clearly a work in progress. The narrative consists of random pieces and notions that might be exciting, but the overall narrative does not make a point, convince or inspire. Discussion about the theory of change is either missing or misleading or confusing.
Good (10-22)= Narrative production is convincing and quite inspiring. The structure and the story make sense and put forward interesting argumentation convincingly. The narrative has some slight faults. Visuals are of good quality and critical parts of the narrative. The theory of change is discussed economically and has at least a weak connection with the narrative and its objectives.
Excellent (21-30)= Narrative production is convincing and inspires action. The structure and the story make sense, and the argumentation is solid, putting forward a new way of looking at something (a concept, situation, people…). There might be some faults or omissions in the work, but they do not cause confusion. Visuals are of good quality and critical parts of the narrative. The theory of change is discussed economically and has a clear connection with the narrative and its objects.
Due: Friday, 9 December 2022, 11:00 PM
Description: Close to finished narrative production understandable on its own.
Time: Based on course workload calculation, there is roughly 30 hours reserved for this step.
Format: PDF recommended. Language: English or Finnish. Class presentations (if any) in English.
Evaluation:Weak (0-9)= Clearly a work in progress. The narrative consists of random pieces and notions that might be exciting, but the overall narrative does not make a point, convince or inspire. Discussion about the theory of change is either missing or misleading or confusing.
Good (10-22)= Narrative production is convincing and quite inspiring. The structure and the story make sense and put forward interesting argumentation convincingly. The narrative has some slight faults. Visuals are of good quality and critical parts of the narrative. The theory of change is discussed economically and has at least a weak connection with the narrative and its objectives.
Excellent (21-30)= Narrative production is convincing and inspires action. The structure and the story make sense, and the argumentation is solid, putting forward a new way of looking at something (a concept, situation, people…). There might be some faults or omissions in the work, but they do not cause confusion. Visuals are of good quality and critical parts of the narrative. The theory of change is discussed economically and has a clear connection with the narrative and its objects.